Dated, clichd, or generic expressions in job utility paperwork detract from a candidate’s {qualifications} and may sign an absence of originality or understanding of the goal position. Examples embrace phrases like “onerous employee,” “crew participant,” or “results-oriented,” which provide little concrete proof of abilities or accomplishments.
Robust resumes make the most of motion verbs and quantifiable achievements to reveal a candidate’s worth proposition successfully. Avoiding weak and overused language permits candidates to current a extra compelling and differentiated narrative, growing the probability of securing an interview. This shift in direction of impactful language displays a rising emphasis on data-driven proof {of professional} success in up to date hiring practices.